Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosalind Baker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 02:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rosalind Baker

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. WP:BEFORE reveals no reliable, independent sources documenting Rosalind Baker's (née Neville) notability. Article relies solely on websites from a connected company and links to her three published books. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 03:02, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. WhinyTheYounger (WtY)(talk, contribs) 03:02, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:08, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:08, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it's clearly promotional and written or dictated by the subject. I don't understand how it has survived so long. Deb (talk) 16:11, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree. No where close to satisfying Fails WP:GNG. MaskedSinger (talk) 20:18, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Can't find reliable and independent sources to meet WP:GNG nor book reviews to help meet WP:NAUTHOR. Samsmachado (talk) 21:58, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 00:31, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with nom. Fails WP:GNG, WP:BIO. Cabrils (talk) 01:34, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.