Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodeo (Lil Nas X and Cardi B song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that WP:NSONG is satisfied. (non-admin closure) wumbolo ^^^ 10:41, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rodeo (Lil Nas X and Cardi B song)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONGS, A track from an EP released only a few days ago, not a single. Can be handled at the article for the EP. --wooden superman 12:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. --wooden superman 12:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. --wooden superman 12:01, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(new !vote below) Merge to 7 (Lil Nas X EP). Not notable. wumbolo ^^^ 13:57, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep Song is a notable collaboration, without a doubt will chart high. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 01:51, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TOOSOON; WP:CRYSTAL. --wooden superman 07:55, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:YOUCANWAITFORTHREEDAYS. By the time this RfD concludes, the charts will be updated. You're wasting time proposing this article and Template:Lil Nas X for deletion. Also, per WP:TOOSOON, a better move would be to just move this page to Draft:Rodeo (Lil Nas X and Cardi B song) for the remainder of the week... Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥) 17:34, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Very Weak Delete - Remember that songs with two artists which are currently dominating the charts tend to chart well, even if they are not singles. The article might have to be recreated if it gets deleted. Foxnpichu (talk) 19:40, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - I'm assuming this is an uninformed nomination? There's standalone coverage from multiple non-trivial, reliable and secondary sources in the article; most notably Uproxx, HotNewHipHop, Spin and Jezebel. Also this song is charting at number 11 on Spotify, top 20 on iTunes, and is being predicted to debut top 20 on the Billboard Hot 100. If anything is "too soon" it's this useless AfD. There's zero reason to delete an article about a song that is going to chart in less than 3 days just to make a WP:POINT. Total nonsense.--N Ø 16:51, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Charted coverage in article. wumbolo ^^^ 08:08, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Given that this has now charted, I am happy to withdraw this nomination. I would however encourage involved editors to not create articles like this WP:TOOSOON, but instead to utilise draft space until notability is clearly achieved. --wooden superman 10:33, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.