Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbie Barrett (Boxer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:57, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Robbie Barrett (Boxer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boxer - does not meet WP:NBOX. Peter Rehse (talk) 20:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 20:32, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not pass WP:NBOX. --Donniediamond (talk) 09:44, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete he is a champion boxer and deserves a place on wiki, some footballers get a page with out even playing a match! Keep! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.221.10.170 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 6 January 2016‎

Delete: fails WP:GNG, WP:NBOX. Quis separabit? 18:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Winning an English regional title is not enough to meet WP:NBOX and I didn't find the significant independent coverage of him to show he meets WP:GNG. The coverage I did find was routine sports reporting--fight results and announcements. Papaursa (talk) 00:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Has not fought for a world title; has not fought for a regular/full national or higher non-world title; has not ranked in the world top ten of any weight class; and hasn't fought for a national amateur title. Fails WP:NBOX. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.