Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rivington Bruce Bisland III

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 04:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rivington Bruce Bisland III

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Only source I could find is [1], which isn't really even about the subject anyways. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Video games. – Pbrks ^(t • c) 04:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Strangely enough, the article creator tagged it as a poorly sourced BLP as they created it. And they've since been indefinitely blocked. Sergecross73 msg me 14:55, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm not convinced about the subject, but that's not my argument. One reference Reddit? Fails to meet all four: (1) significant coverage, (2) independent, (3) reliable, and (4) secondary source. Rhadow (talk) 23:32, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to fail WP:NBIO. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 05:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Rhadow. Not enough sources and fails several basic policies. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.