Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rivals.ph

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rivals.ph

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Site seems dead (fell off Alexa graph last April), and all we have here is promotional language, generic history, and uncited fluffy claims. DMacks (talk) 16:10, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:26, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The references are poor and I am not finding better on this website. I found one passing mention of rivals.ph as one of several sponsors of a poker tournament (Manila Bulletin 2014 – via HighBeam (subscription required) ) but would have expected more if the subject was notable, as Highbeam has decent inclusion of Philippines media. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:NWEB, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 11:31, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as sources are only announcements with nothing becoming genuine substance, and there's simply nothing else in this but a business listing. SwisterTwister talk 03:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.