Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhapsody of Realities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:04, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rhapsody of Realities

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted back in 2015 for being promotional, this still feels WP:PROMOTIONAL! I don't see WP:GNG met and was changed to a redirect recently only to be changed back. AfD seemed to be the next course of action. Govvy (talk) 09:23, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: G11 Case, promotional, book itself has no independent coverage CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:34, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to show it meets WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:50, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. AdoTang (talk) 17:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unencyclopaedic (is that a word?) promo piece on a non-notable book, clearly fails WP:GNG / WP:NBOOK. I would have said redir to the article on the author, but no point if that's been undone already, therefore delete (and salt). --DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's mention of this book in articles about the church and Oyakhilome, but I don't see where there's really a lot of coverage for the book itself. Not to where it'd comfortably pass NBOOK, in any case. I'd recommend a selective merge into either the author or church's article, however the promotional prose would need to be cleaned up. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:38, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.