Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rek-Vee Industries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 11:55, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rek-Vee Industries

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTABILITY. The only source in the article also includes only a passing mention of Rek-Vee. The article is also orphaned. BenzoAid (talk) 10:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. BenzoAid (talk) 10:22, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Oh me, oh my, but Angelfire. How does that take me back? Outside that, and other Wikis derived from it, and a smattering of passing mentions in books, there's nothing much out there. I'd perhaps propose an ATD possible redirect to Public transportation in Toronto, but there's nothing to justify a standalone article. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:39, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't even think a redirect would be plausible, because so little (reliable) sources exist for Rek-Vee, so deleting seems like the most plausible option. BenzoAid (talk) 12:41, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unreferenced and no gnews hits. Fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 01:20, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.