Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Gage
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:18, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Randy Gage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROMO, do not see enough to meet BIO or any of its subsections John from Idegon (talk) 23:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 06:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as I see nothing convincingly better to suggest a better article. SwisterTwister talk 07:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- weak keep It reeks of WP:PROMO and, quite frankly, IDONTLIKEIT (I hate the use of WP for PROMO), however, those are real bestseller lists and a search news turns up real sourcing [1]. E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. A book on the nYT self-help list list should no longer be regarded as indication of notability. This article is an example of the reason. DGG ( talk ) 01:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.