Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raines International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 14:07, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Raines International

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional and non notable. Makes claims to excellence based only on its own web page. DGG ( talk ) 23:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 00:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the best I found was some links at News but simply nothing better. Notfying past taggers Northamerica1000, Morbidthoughts, SchreiberBike and DanielRigal. SwisterTwister talk 00:05, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The news coverage is thin stuff and not enough to demonstrate sufficient notability. I don't see anything else. --DanielRigal (talk) 00:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No evidence of notablility. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 03:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Classic promotional puffery -- their "client base includes some of the world's best performing companies" -- with nothing meaningful in terms of sources about the company to back it up. Alansohn (talk) 04:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Very highly promotional, but more importantly, does not meet the notability guidelines. Mentions on the search engines consist of trivial mentions and WP:ROUTINE announcements. Or press releases. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.