Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabindranath Tagore filmography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎ as a G3 hoax/blatant misrepresentation. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 00:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rabindranath Tagore filmography

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page was created by a now-blocked sock puppet. The content within the page appears to be entirely made up; a lot of the entries listed are actually the works of Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay (could be a case of WP:HOAX). Not to mention that we already have the article Adaptations of works of Rabindranath Tagore in film and television, which would only make this page a redundant duplicate. Keivan.f^Talk 05:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete WP:HOAX should be deleted immediately Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 05:55, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A redundant duplicate at best. Commonssense (talk) 06:50, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Misleading and duplicate resulting as a hoax — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 08:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Lists. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:41, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Adaptations of works of Rabindranath Tagore in film and television -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:57, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it would best to delete it first and then redirect it to the original article because merely redirecting it at this point would keep all the inaccurate content within the page's history. Keivan.f^Talk 17:01, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Thank you for your thoughtful reply and concern; I wouldn't worry about it too much, though, if it’s in the history of a redirect page; and keeping a redirect allows to keep history and credits of all the accurate content too. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 17:35, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and West Bengal. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 13:06, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Misleading article. Orientls (talk) 16:52, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Internet, and India. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 11:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated for G3 deletion based on the comments here. Jdcomix (talk) 20:15, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I contested it. The page cannot be said a blatant hoax. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 21:51, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.