Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/REVE Systems

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

REVE Systems

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable and promotional , with unproven and unlikely claims. Almost all the refs are PR., or disguised pR. The Red Harring awards do not show notability -- they're a promotional device . DGG ( talk ) 16:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:19, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 22:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-Absulutely no sign of notability. Fails basic notability guidelines.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 01:02, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article reads more like a promotional blurb than anything encyclopedic.TH1980 (talk) 01:55, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The appropriate SNG is WP:NCORP which requires references containing in-depth information on the company and content independent content which includes original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references meet the requirements, topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing 17:59, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.