Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen of the Hours

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close. This was already considered, and redirected, via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Movement (Jumping Biz). This is not the appropriate venue to consider expanding back from a redirect. —C.Fred (talk) 20:11, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Queen of the Hours

Ok what is the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Equaliser (talk • contribs) 2008/12/14 01:40:49

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 16:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note, someone boldly redirected the article based on a previous bundle nomination. - Mgm|^(talk) 17:26, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This entry has more than trivial information which makes it worth to keep it as a separate article. - Mgm|^(talk) 17:26, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: as per the other previous non-single tracks. JamesBurns (talk) 00:20, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per MacGyverMagic. -- MISTER ALCOHOL ^T ^C 03:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Comment: Okay, this generated discussion but it was never listed at AFD and thus never came to attention of the community. I listed it in today's log so that this can be discussed. Note, this was deleted as a bunch at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First Movement (Jumping Biz). Regards So Why 19:31, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.