Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Frankis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 01:14, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Peter Frankis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
fails WP:CREATIVE. doesn't seem a significant career of writing a few books. Google book search and limited third party coverage in Google news. not sure if the one not well known award is enough to make him notable. Michellecrisp (talk) 03:22, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Here's the website for the organization that gave out the award. It looks like a run of the mill club to me. - Mgm|(talk) 09:42, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:20, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — if the abovementioned society was a major one, then I would contend that the author passes WP:N, but I don't think it is. MuZemike (talk) 02:00, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Virtually no critical coverage, at least on web. The award received is also not significant enough to warrant inclusion. LeaveSleaves talk 21:36, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.