Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peppersmith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:16, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peppersmith

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

SPA only promotional article. Minimal coverage - far less than expected to meet GNG's significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject Rayman60 (talk) 11:12, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 12:07, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 12:07, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Originally a WP:SPA article about a company, sourced to start-up coverage of their product. I don't see that start-up coverage as demonstrating notability of either the product or the company producing it, and searches are not finding better than routine listings which can verify existence but not demonstrate attained encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 11:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete coverage consists of WP:MILL-style passing and directory mentions; fails SIGCOV. ——Serial 11:15, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.