Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paris By Night 103

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Agree that there is nothing to assert the notability of this one episode in particular. As Hammersoft says, the list of episodes is sufficient. I'm not going to go ahead and delete any of the rest of episode articles, because they weren't bundled into this AfD, but I wouldn't be opposed to seeing a bundled AfD for the rest. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paris By Night 103

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that the article qualifies WP:GNG. One source with poorly written content - if sources to indicate it can pass WP:GNG then I'd still suggest blowing it up and starting again. DrStrauss talk 18:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 07:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 07:19, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for SOFTDEL due to previous PROD/dePROD joe decker ^talk 02:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe decker ^talk 02:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar 08:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing to assert notability. The one (now dead) link would apparently support when the work was taped. That doesn't assert notability either. We have no way of verifying any of it. Further, there's no claim of significance. This is possibly even a candidate for WP:CSD#A7. There are a ton of these; see List of Paris by Night episodes. A cursory review of some of the others that have articles show no claims of significance in them either. The list is, by itself, probably sufficient. This episode article needs to go, as do all the others. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.