Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paranoia (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:12, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paranoia (magazine)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I put this up for deletion because it appears to fail general notability guidelines. There are several mentions of accolades that would meet notability guidelines on the page but the only verification I can find is on the homepage of paranoia magazine. If someone could find independent verification of that of that it would confirm that this should not be deleted. as it stands I can find a single mention in the Washington Post from 2008 found here Rap Chart Mike (talk) 00:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:17, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:17, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:02, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:08, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nominator because I too can't find anything useful about this magazine. There is no significant coverage of it in independent verifiable secondary sources except a few passing by mentions. All of the material in the History section is purely synthesized (with few exceptions.) Harsh Rathod Poke me! 09:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete lacks sufficient coverage to meet notability.Dlohcierekim's sock User talk:Dlohcierekim 06:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.