Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panam (brand)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:28, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Panam (brand)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current state of sourcing and WP Before doesn't help to establish notability per WP ORG or NCORP. Promotion only J. P. Fridrich (talk) 07:36, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The company meets notability. The four references used are via reliable sources and provide extensive coverage specifically about Panam. A PROQUEST WP:BEFORE search of "Panam shoes Mexico" turned up 102 results. JSFarman (talk) 16:59, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
none of the 100 plus results meet NCORP criteria for reliable in-depth independent coverage. Passing mentions and routine only 2A02:85F:9A06:7C28:8C9F:F432:2C6D:64B7 (talk) 12:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These are not passing. San Diego Union Tribune , Telediario Mazatlan Post , Austria, Xóchitl. 2018. “Él Hizo ‘Cool’ a Los Tenis Ochenteros.” Entrepreneur Mexico 26 (10): 52–56. (4 pages) (Via EBSCO). A brief result via Google books refers to Panam as "hugely popular the '80s, though their ubiquity dropped off after..." The company was founded in 1962. Look offline and online via Google Mexico. Pinging the editor who created this article, LeDeroider, as they have expertise in this area -- 26 sneaker/shoe articles, two of which have been deleted -- and can likely add more references. JSFarman (talk) 16:04, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Fashion, and Mexico. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 09:44, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: In concurrence with JSFarman. XxTechnicianxX (talk) 04:25, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.