Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PA 3006
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 00:09, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- PA 3006 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable street [1]. Dough4872 00:15, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Quadrant routes are not inherently notable, and there doesn't seem to be anything remarkable about this one. – TMF 01:20, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – non-notable street. Secondarily, the article title is incorrect and violates WP:Naming conventions (U.S. state and territory highways). Imzadi 1979 → 01:56, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails GNG. —Fredddie™ 05:55, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - List of State Routes in Pennsylvania seems to imply that State routes should be treated as notable and quadrant routes probably NN. The objection to the present name would be resolved by moving it to a more appropriate one. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:50, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Quadrant routes are not notable. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 01:30, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Quadrant routes fail WP:N. mono 20:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless it can be significantly expanded (say, to GA or higher). Not only does it fail WP:N but also it is too short and jargonic to provide any information whatsoever. --PCB 15:27, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.