Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenPortal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OpenPortal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:Notability (web) and too short. ♪ anonim.one ♪ 10:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Being a stub is not grounds for deletion. Most GNews sources are in French. Some read like they're genuinely independent[1] but that's still just a routine story about signing clients, and I'm not sure it gets to lasting significance in the development of its field. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete (WP:CSD § A7): I see no reason to claim that this software stands out of the rest of similar solutions. Literally: I don't know what I could add to this article, even if I wasn't limited by WP:OR. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 21:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Software does not fall under A7. →Σ τ c. 06:49, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —SW— ^confabulate 16:13, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment May meet WP:WEB, having a number of WP:NOENG verifiable references. -- Trevj (talk) 12:24, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 03:28, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete—The non-English references User:Trevj has found are referring to a French company that markets an ERP software product. This is not the subject of this article. The subject of this article is an open-source software product that has no coverage in reliable sources. Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 00:17, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.