Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OneCricket
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 04:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- OneCricket (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NCORP and WP:NWEB. Coverage is routine in nature and limited to promotional press releases and namedrops. Maduant (talk) 04:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Cricket, Websites, and India. Maduant (talk) 04:49, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Weak Delete Although it fails to meet WP:WEBCRIT as the refs are unreliable and not working too, reliable sources just embedding the OneCricket Tweets on their pages. The reason is to Weak, there is a race of media and the same web content companies where why would one company promote its competitor. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:29, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haryana-related deletion discussions. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 06:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.