Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Number Enigmas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. A "Good Faith" award to Bob for nominating his own article in good faith; that takes integrity, and were that more Wikipedia editors like him. The Bushranger One ping only 11:20, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Number Enigmas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One of the earliest articles I created, which I now realize is completely non-notable--I can't find any sources at all to use as refs for this page. BobAmnertiopsis∴ChatMe! 04:09, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I found a number of user reviews, but none that could be considered reliable independent sources. I agree, this book falls below notability guidelines and the article should be deleted. Mark viking (talk) 04:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per article creator's own observation that it is not notable. I commend Bob for nominating the article. Doczilla STOMP! 07:33, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – The article is not notable because there aren't any reliable sources available. The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 09:01, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:33, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per reasonable request of article creator, although there has been somewhat too much activity since creation for a G7 speedy deletion. There are no sources to be found, and worldcat shows this as being held in only a single-digit number of libraries. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:45, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does not meet WP:NBOOK and the final nail in the coffin is the creator's nomination. Mkdwtalk 11:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.