Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nsure

Nsure

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP Theroadislong (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance and Florida. Theroadislong (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you want to delete this page? Meiswikepiediaeditor (talk) 14:50, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The nominator believes it should be deleted because it does not meet the notability criteria for companies. Which are discussed on the WP:NCORP page. Guliolopez (talk) 16:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for aforementioned notability issues. Only the Forbes article seems like it could contribute any notability, but it's not enough without other independent, reliable sources. I did a quick search that also didn't come up with anything if note. Urchincrawler (talk) 10:25, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Forbes article is by a former contributor rather than a staff member so is not a reliable source as per WP:FORBESCON, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:35, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As mentioned by the nominator, there is no indication that this company (which has perhaps <100 employees) meets WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. There is no claim to notability in the text itself (which describes a normal small company). The references in the article are all press releases, "customer testimonials" and primary or run-of-the-mill webpages that do not contribute to notability. In terms of available sources, outside the article, a WP:BEFORE search just returns the same type of coverage we might expect for any such small-to-medium sized company. Guliolopez (talk) 16:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:39, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep seems to have over 100 employes and follows rules Meiswikepiediaeditor (talk) 17:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
that is not a part of the criteria. Theroadislong (talk) 17:42, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – I can't find any sources that meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Clearly a run-of-the-mill company. --bonadea contributions talk 11:43, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as didn't find any substantial non-promotional coverage that would pass the strict conditions of WP:NCORP, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]