Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nova bomb (Andromeda)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:35, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nova bomb (Andromeda)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure fiction cruft without any notability. Fails WP:NOTPLOT/WP:NOTWIKIA. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 22:18, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Yeah, definitely fails WP:GNG, let alone WP:NOTPLOT. This isn't Andromeda Wikia. If I could see some RSes showing that the concept of a "nova bomb" has reached outside of the Andromeda universe and into the mainstream, then maybe. But as far as I can tell, this is not the case. --Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 02:11, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No merging or redirection, I cannot imagine anyone typing this into the search box. Ifnord (talk) 22:36, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.