Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Cussing Club (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 23:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No Cussing Club

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essentially a WP:ONEEVENT group that got e-mail-bombed and featured in various News of the Weird segments last heard from in a puff-piece by ABC News in early 2009. Per WP:NOT#NEWS, I submit that this organization fails our notability test of WP:ORG since we are tasked by that guideline to consider the "organization’s longevity, size of membership, or major achievements, or other factors specific to the organization...." I submit that considering these factors makes it very dubious that this parochial organization is notable enough for this encyclopedia. Past AfDs were probably blindsided by the recentism of the news-coverage. Current consensus on the talk page of the article seems to indicate that the article should be deleted. ScienceApologist (talk) 23:30, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteI have to agree. There seems little or no coverage beyond the "and finaly" style. The two schools do n ot seem to have consoderd this noteworthy (and one has a schools club page which does not feature this club, which indicates to me that it was ini no way an 'offical' school club). There is no independant varification of most of this clubs claims. It would also appear to have now disapeared being essentiualy a one of shot at fame.Slatersteven (talk) 14:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Agree with the nom. It's not even a 15 minutes of fame sort of piece. This is slow news day material. Shadowjams (talk) 06:15, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with above. Taylor Karras (talk) 16:52, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability seems seriously lacking. Surv1v4l1st ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 20:30, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.