Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nizami Brothers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus seems clear after the improvements. (The ref. format still needs some cleanup, btw) DGG ( talk ) 00:56, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nizami Brothers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been tagged for notability for almost two years, and nothing has been done to improve this. If they are indeed notable, hopefully this AfD will establish so. Otherwise, there is little reason to keep this article. -Lilac Soul ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 07:13, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What checks have you made to determine whether the notability tag is accurate? Phil Bridger (talk) 18:17, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Nomination done without checking on notable resources given, notability tag should have been removed. Extensive media coverage. Google. --Ekabhishek^talk 10:46, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:59, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Darkwind (talk) 00:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relister's comment: Several sources have been added to the article since the nomination. Discussion should continue with these new sources in mind. —Darkwind (talk) 00:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I wouldn't exactly call the media coverage "extensive", but there's just enough of a collective passing mention to keep it above WP:BAND. Deadbeef (talk) 03:26, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the sources added seem to establish notability. I've also been bold and removed the notability tag placed on the article, which is now redundant. Valenciano (talk) 06:36, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.