Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nelabhotla Venkateswarlu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 00:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nelabhotla Venkateswarlu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO. nothing in gnews [1]. google mainly has directory listings [2]. LibStar (talk) 05:48, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, appears to be just a non-notable executive of a firm. I can't find anything of significance about him. Glenfarclas (talk) 06:03, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. There are Google News references to him as "N Venkat". Sometimes people with long names use a shorter version for business purposes. Here is an article which refers to him as a "management guru": Kalavalapalli, Yogendra (2009-06-15). "Hot tips from management gurus". The Hindu. Retrieved 19 January 2010. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:02, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:02, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — Eastmain (talk • contribs) 08:02, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - The references currently in the article are all links to mainstream India financial media. He has received widespread coverage as "N. Venkat". (though a lot of that coverage is sourced from press releases and product launches). --Sodabottle (talk) 08:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - enough sources to establish notability, and I suspect more can be found by searching in Hindi and Urdu. Pantherskin (talk) 09:04, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

this individual has no article in either Hindi or Urdu, so there may not be significant coverage in those languages. LibStar (talk) 03:36, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- For someone in the corporate world, Hindi coverage would only be a subset of English coverage and Urdu a subset of that. Vernacular press is helpful for other areas but not for business/industry. -SpacemanSpiff 18:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Even if this field were an except to the general guideline that sources in any language are adequate for this or for any other subject, there are sufficient English language sources already present for notability . DGG ( talk ) 20:43, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.