Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia G's Bitchin' Kitchen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Nadia G. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:36, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nadia G's Bitchin' Kitchen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a television cooking show, referenced entirely to IMDb and primary sources (its dead profile on the website of the channel that used to carry it and the host's own self-published foodblog) with no evidence of reliable source coverage shown at all. As always, every television show does not get an automatic free pass over WP:TVSHOW just because it can be nominally verified as existing -- it needs to be the subject of reliable source coverage in media to qualify for an article, but there's none here. Bearcat (talk) 06:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:57, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or redirect to Nadia G. A separate article about her show is redundant, and there isn't enough notability nor enough third-party sources for it to stand on its own anyway. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 02:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Nadia G. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:56, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as suggested ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:55, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.