Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia Essex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 09:21, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nadia Essex

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor tv personality who fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR/WP:ENTERTAINER. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable 9H48F (talk) 02:03, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:54, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:54, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:54, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:55, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note:It This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:55, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A Google search turned up little more than non-WP:RS tabloid newspaper gossip, and no independent third-party RS mentions. Narky Blert (talk) 11:42, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, looks like this was originally a redirect that someone altered. So this could just turn back into a Redirect to Celebs Go Dating. Wgolf (talk) 22:16, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Agree with above per ATD. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 02:02, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've made significant improvements to the article which I created as a redirect and which TellyShows turned into an article. She meets WP:GNG - there are sources added from many reliable sources - BBC, The Independent, The Guardian etc.; I'm struggling to see how she doesn't meet WP:GNG. There's also a potential case for WP:ENT #1: Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. However, of the multiple tv shows she's been on, she has been a significant part of an episode or series, but apart from Celebs GO Dating I don't know if they would overall count as 'significant' roles. However, she does meet WP:BASIC / WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 07:55, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Significant coverage in reliable sources. --Cyfal (talk) 19:52, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Same reason as above. MyanmarBBQ (talk) 12:25, 15 April 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Comment - While I appreciate the good work done by Boleyn, 7 of the articles arise directly out of her participation in the single show, Celebs Go Dating, 1 (the Channel4 listing) is a press release, 1 (the itv) is a video clip, and 2 are simple listings (RT and Spears). Appears to fit WP:BIO1E. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:41, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment decline WP:BIO1E, now she does meet WP:BASIC/WP:GNG. MyanmarBBQ (talk) 10:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B dash (talk) 02:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.