Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nader Ezzeddine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 09:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nader Ezzeddine

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:PROF. There are no references to this person in basic searches other than a staff page and trivial mentions. He has published some papers but their levels of citation seem unremarkable. The article itself is more of a resume than a biography. Jbh ^Talk 14:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 14:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 14:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Jbh ^Talk 14:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete My searches are not turning up anything that would meet WP:GNG or WP:PROF. I was concerned that the first-person style indicated a copyvio, but that doesn't seem to be the case either. EricEnfermero (Talk) 15:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or a specific guideline such as WP:ACADEMIC. --Kinu ^t/_c 16:03, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now unfortunately as although it seemed News, Books, browser and Scholar found some links, there's nothing to suggest better yet. Notifying tagger Dthomsen8. SwisterTwister talk 06:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.