Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monticello Fire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2014 California wildfires. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:05, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Monticello Fire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTNEWS. There was only coverage in July 2014 when it happened and nothing more. There was also no lasting impact. SL93 (talk) 08:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The editor has created several of these types of articles. SL93 (talk) 08:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: My reason for creating this article and articles like it is to archive significant fires that have happened in the state of California. The significance of this fire was its relation to several other wildfires in virtually the exact same area, including the very recent Winters fire which caused me to write the article. --DanEverett45 (talk) 08:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:44, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge key details to 2014 California wildfires. This fails WP:NEVENT in terms of lack of secondary source coverage beyond the time of the event, but the aforementioned article is readily suited to include nearly all the prose given here. --MASEM (t) 12:47, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:37, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:37, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:20, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:48, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets wp:GNG. And it seems useful, good. --do ncr am 18:23, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.