Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohazzabul Lughat India
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 11:56, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mohazzabul Lughat India (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This might be a nice encyclopedia for sure but there exists hardly any coverage. I was able to locate one Urdu article on Adbi Miras by Mahzar Raza entitled Lughat-nigari ke chand Masail aur Muhazzabul Lughat, (Some issues pertaining to lexicography and the Muhazzabul Lughat) but I hesitate calling Adbi Miras a reliable source. This article has remained unsourced/unexpanded since last ten years and there aren't any available sources that could help it remain here. Comments! ─ The Aafī (talk) 10:50, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ─ The Aafī (talk) 10:50, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:03, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Gazal world (talk) 19:44, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Reference works are not inherently notable, they need to meet GNG (WP:NBOOK, etc.). There is no evidence this one does so, although sources may exist in non-English (and non-Latin scripts), perhaps. Ping me on the off chance such coverage is found. PS. No interwiki to Urdu Wikipedia is a red flag. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:33, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: incorrectly listed under Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. A real-world encyclopedia can hardly be fictional. Pilaz (talk) 23:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
- Pilaz, I've removed it. ─ The Aafī (talk) 04:20, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.