Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maverican
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 00:39, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Maverican (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is a non-notable neologism. Wikipedia is also not a dictionary, but mainly this thing is non-notable, not even the two "references" mention it Scapler (talk) 01:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Blogger coinage that hasn't gone mainstream yet, and probably won't. 24 Google hits, most of which are non-US sites that use it as an apparently insulting mispronunciation of "American". Rklear (talk) 02:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:18, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I declined the speedy but was going to nominate it myself with the exact same rationale given by Scapler. A neologism with no references (the refs given make no mention of it). faithless (speak) 02:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Protologism, fails WP:NEO and WP:V. — neuro(talk) 03:35, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - this term has not achieved notability. Also, the article reads too much like a dictionary definition. - Richard Cavell (talk) 07:46, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.