Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark B Marcus Byrd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete the Mark B Marcus Byrd article. Nobody commented on Carolina Anthem (all the comments were about "he" or "the article" (singular) so I am closing that one as no consensus, with no prejudice against speedy renomination. MelanieN (talk) 23:51, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mark B Marcus Byrd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another of the Natalac walled garden. It is just possible that there is one valid topic between this and Carolina Anthem, but frankly I think not. Guy (Help!) 09:13, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:49, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nothing better for WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 17:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP Your Wrong "Guy" / Jzg " Natalac walled garden? ::Really:: What ever you have personally against Natalac or what I write is on you.. I'll ignore your petty games and add refs for this page that you've selfishly sought out salted and attacked with your falsehoods..and opinions.. just so it will be noted..

POWER 98 FM - http://power98fm.com/2015/12/07/carolina-street-connect-mark-b/

FOX NEWS - http://www.foxcarolina.com/Clip/12171076/rapper-creates-carolina-panthers-anthem

Chat Sports - http://www.chatsports.com/carolina-panthers/a/carolina-forever-new-panthers-anthem-perfect-super-bowl-rallying-cry-25349

Charlotte Observer - http://www.charlotteobserver.com/living/liv-columns-blogs/theoden-janes/article53079795.html

WSPA - http://wspa.com/2016/01/25/panthers-super-fan-writes-carolina-anthem/

Carolina Panthers practicing Josh Norman Working out to Mark B Carolina Anthem - https://www.instagram.com/p/1J84zVHImb/

Josh Norman Working out to Mark B Carolina Anthem again - https://www.instagram.com/p/5JDOKXnIqe/

Any Images from Players, Mark B etc. Available link - Natalac Records - https://www.flickr.com/photos/natalac/? Yameka (talk) 20:21, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:52, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Swister Twister, although the article certainly needs some cleanup. Vanamonde93 (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The sources above are mainly non-reliable and all are trivial. They certainly do not meet the requirements of WP:N. Neither does he meet any of the criteria at WP:MUSICBIO. Polequant (talk) 15:46, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not notable. --OpenFuture (talk) 14:31, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet wp:NMUSIC, which requires at multiple, independent, non-promotional sources. I don't consider radio and TV entertainment sections to be independent or non-promotional. This is a single musical work that has gotten attention, and it is mainly connected to this one sports event. His musical works, including this one, are self-published. So until he gets a recording contract and there are serious reviews of his work, he doesn't meet notability. LaMona (talk) 02:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.