Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MahiFX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 16:09, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

MahiFX

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find multiple examples of independent, significant coverage about this company in reliable sources - appears to be non-notable. _nonsense ferret 14:38, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:21, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:21, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reads like spam and contains nothing to make me think that this firm is notable Nick-D (talk) 01:35, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, concur with above, appears to be advertising copy rather than an encyclopædia article. Sources in the article are either press releases, blog entries, or do not mention the company. Even if the company were notable we'd need some WP:TNT to bring the article up to scratch. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:44, 5 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.