Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeenathul Uloom Arabic College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Madeenathul Uloom Arabic College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Advertising, marketing or public relations •~~ Arts Rescuer 09:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC) — ArtsRescuer (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Shafinusri (talk • contribs). [reply]

Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:53, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 15:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to University of Calicut, of which it is affiliated. Bearian (talk) 19:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Appears to be a degree-awarding institution and is affiliated to a recognised university. Just because an Indian college is affiliated to a university doesn't mean it's part of it - such institutions are independent, separate, and usually given their own articles. Not advertising in any way. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 01:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e^talk 00:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. VMS Mosaic (talk) 23:52, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the degrees are enough, even if this article could certainly use better information. SwisterTwister talk 02:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.