Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MIFA Allstars Ontario

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 00:18, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MIFA Allstars Ontario

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam, WP:NORG failure JohnnyHunt (talk) 13:30, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 4. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:44, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- Significant enough. I have searched and it has received significant coverage plus it has also participated in multiple international tournaments. The article also got multiple references as well. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by IamJayYas (talk • contribs) 05:29, 7 November 2021 (UTC) [reply]
Comment The article already got several references and more references can be added too if needed. Billyatthewheels (talk) 21:49, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Noting that IamJayYas is blocked as a sockpuppet of Billyatthewheels.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify There's major issues with the article as it is, mainly that MIFA is not just a women's team, but an organization with several teams. I've edited the article to try and fix this issue, but there's other issues with COI/UNDUE/REFSPAM that also need to be addressed. I do think the sources provided constitute significant coverage for WP:ORG (especially considering WP:AUD as this is a regional team for Mississauga/Toronto), but the article in its current state is a mess that isn't ready for mainspace. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 11:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Significant coverage available. And the links added in the article also looks significant enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.111.137.11 (talk) 14:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: Not ready for mainspace due to lack of WP:SIGCOV in WP:ORGIND sources. Incubate in draftspace. ––FormalDude ^talk 08:19, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.