Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxo Jr 2: The Reckoning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Luxo Jr 2: The Reckoning

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, fan-made film (not by Pixar). ... discospinster _talk 16:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 16:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about a sequel to a film that was a major development in the animation industry. Other articles have Wikipedia pages about their sequels so why can't this one have one? What makes one think that Luxo Jr. 2 is a non-notable fan-made film. One doesn't even know Shark Fantastic is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quit42 (talk • contribs) 17:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Well, it's definitely a fan film, not an official Pixar production. And, like any film, reliable sources are necessary to prove that the film is notable per WP:NFILM. This article has zero sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable fan film that fails WP:NFILM. Donaldd23 (talk) 18:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG by quite a long way and not even an assertion of notability let alone evidence. If there were a WP:A7 for films, this would surely qualify. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This exists and can be watched, but that doesn't make it notable. Notability is also not inherited by the original film's notability. Keep in mind that even if this was an official sequel rather than a fan film, this short would still not inherit notability. The fact that this is a fan film has little bearing on this other than the fact that fan films almost never gain enough coverage to pass notability guidelines. There are just too many of them and too few outlets that are interested in covering them. It's nothing against the short film. There's just no coverage that can be found. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NFILM/WP:GNG. Kolma8 (talk) 20:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.