Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lioncon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Chronicles of Narnia. Sandstein 15:23, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lioncon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY; has been tagged for notability for 7 years. Pinging Brewcrewer. Boleyn (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

weak keep Or redirect to Chronicles of Narnia. Wgolf (talk) 20:10, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually a merge could be a good idea. Wgolf (talk) 20:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-Per nom. Not yet notable enough. When it become, we will get it here. Educationtemple (talk) 20:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
merge When I made this article seven years ago, it looked to me like it would be notable in time. But after all these years...I tend to agree with Wgolf that a merge might be the best idea for this. - Alternativity (talk) 16:38, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:09, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 19:40, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, does not meet notability requirements. Don4of4 ^[Talk] 05:45, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to a suitable Narnia article. Does not meet WP:GNG. Appears to be a one-off. Google search brings up notices advertising the 2008 convention and some fan blog mentions only and a podcast of one of the seminars at the convention, no reviews or discussion of it found, no further conventions after 2008 found. Convention website listed in the References section brings up a nothing found message (see [1]). Coolabahapple (talk) 05:32, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:12, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.