Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lewis Masonic
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Feel free to redirect or discuss that on the appropriate page. If you need to see the article to merge, just ask. Missvain (talk) 22:20, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Lewis Masonic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:NCORP Theroadislong (talk) 19:38, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 19:38, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Theroadislong (talk) 19:38, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:49, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect to Ian Allan Publishing, which owns the imprint. I'm not finding any sources sufficient to meet WP:NCORP, but covering the subject in the broader article (where it's already mentioned) would seem to be a reasonable alternative to deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:07, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom, nothing found-able which satisfies WP:NCORP CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Fails NCORP. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:55, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.