Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Zenda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I am not opposed to draftifying a page if there is any evidence that the subject is likely to pass our notability guidelines at some point in the future. But I'm not really seeing that here and the consensus is clearly against keeping this page at the present time. Nonetheless this close is w/o prejudice to an undelete request should the subject garner enough coverage to ring the WP:N bell at a future date. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:41, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keith Zenda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Zimbabwean contemporary artist. Fails WP:BIO. Google News search returns just 3 mentions, all of them trivial. Bbarmadillo (talk) 16:18, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:22, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:22, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:22, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: User:Bobbyshabangu That sounds like an idea (to draftify) - if there are more reliable sources in books and the press that show significant coverage of his work, such as reviews, chapters in books, art historical essays in journals, etc. Also significant exhibitions like one-person shows in museums, and list any works that have been acquired in museum collections and permanent public art works. See WP:CREATIVE. It seems like it may be a case of WP:TOOSOON at this time. Netherzone (talk) 14:25, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Since when moving a non-notable page to a draft is the outcome of the AfD? --Bbarmadillo (talk) 13:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.