Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kansas Bowling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfy. The topic is not appropriate for the article space at this time, but there is no harm in allowing the creator to develop it further. Article content moved to User:Hellohart/Kansas Bowling. I, JethroBT ^{drop me a line} 09:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas Bowling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A case of too soon, known for a film which as yet doesn't exist. Fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The film is coming out in March on DVD and vod and does exist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hellohart (talk • contribs) 22:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you say it's too soon, would there be a way to temporarily take the page down until the film comes out? What makes it legitimate? The poster? The trailer? Let me know Hellohart (talk) 22:15, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As it's too soon, the article could be moved to draftspace if others agree. In order to stay on Wikipedia, you need reliable sources about them, to show that they are notable. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And any move would not be immediate or automatic. it would still be dependent upon the subject meeting the criteria for a stand alone article. actually having a product instead of the promise of a product will sometimes be the tipping point that convinces some people. but the actual product on the market also often leads to more actual coverage of the subject.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I see nothing currently better. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 06:37, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not seem likely it will ever be notable. DGG ( talk ) 18:09, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy. If this is "too soon", then it should be given back to the writer. It seems as though they are getting whacked for being new, but that's nothing unusual. --MurderByDeadcopy^"bang!" 02:17, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Userfy - WP:TOOSOON indeed. There's some buzz about her (more so, I think, than the movie), but not enough to satisfy WP:BIO at this point. No objection to userfication. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 05:12, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.