Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judge Dredd: Mega-City One

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 11:15, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Judge Dredd: Mega-City One

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Potential TV show, still in development, not yet in production or attached to a broadcaster. Creating an article now is jumping the gun. Lots of shows don't make it out of development. WP:TVSHOW: "in most cases, a television series is not eligible for an article until its scheduling as an ongoing series has been formally confirmed by a television network. A mere announcement that a pilot is in development may be noted in the Wikipedia articles about its creators, writers or confirmed cast members, but absent significant evidence that the pilot has notability for reasons beyond simple confirmation of its existence, the announcement itself is not sufficient basis for a standalone article about the pilot." Nicknack009 (talk) 00:13, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom; a WP:BEFORE indicates only coverage at this stage is (perhaps to be expected) fansites and blogs. — fortunavelut luna 07:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 09:45, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment don't know about this one... More editors should look into it. It is listed on imdb though and big names are involved... — Preceding unsigned comment added by MusicPatrol (talk • contribs) 19:26, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's on IMDB. "Big names are involved" is not true, though - there are no names at all attached.

The show has not even gone into production yet. Per Wikipedia policy, it's not notable enough for a Wikipedia article until it's actually scheduled. I don't see why there's any need for more comments. --Nicknack009 (talk) 06:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.