Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juancho Trivino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:02, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Juancho Trivino

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet notability criteria under WP:BIO; the news website referenced is an article about the TV show which makes only a passing mention of the actor's name, and no other gnews or ghits apart than social networks etc. Not notable yet; may become so in future but notability must be current, not potential. Baldy Bill (talk) 20:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page for exactly the same reasoning:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Since when do we accept FB as a source? --E4024 (talk) 18:33, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both articles - Completely fail notability - lack of sources to be found. Mabalu (talk) 20:32, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect both to Teen_Gen#Main_characters - It seems the show only started airing recently and, to my knowledge, both of them haven't achieved significant careers. Yes, there are several news sources briefly mentioning them here, here, here and here but nothing to establish notability or a detailed article. Redirect with no prejudice towards a future article for each of them. SwisterTwister talk 04:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both - Too soon to have an article at this point. I don't think a redirect is an option either since they'll probably have more roles in the future. No prejudice against recreation should either gain popularity eventually. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:44, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.