Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge Alberto Rodríguez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. (non-admin closure) — Jkudlick ^tc_s 03:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jorge Alberto Rodríguez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person does not appear notable. Unable to verify sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kigali1 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:42, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 08:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not Delete as I am an author who is personally contracted to write a book detailing the life and history of Jorge Alberto Rodriguez. I know him personally and his story is very much real. He was arrested by U.S. Customs on 06 July 1990 in Tallahassee, Florida. He went to trial in the U.S. Federal Court in Tallahassee on 18 October 1990 and was found guilty on 21 October 1990. What more references are needed to verify his name and existence? Elizabethcastro talk 09:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The kind of references that can actually be verified. None of the references provided are verifiable. Does claiming to know him personally violate wikipedia's policy of a conflict of interest?, Kigali1 talk 13:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Elizabethcastro: see WP:Identifying reliable sources. – Fayenatic London 19:15, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Potential keep -- If true, the subject must have been notorious. The Cali cartel certainly were, though the identify of is members was less well-known. It ought not to be difficult to find reliable sources from newspaper reports of his arrest and trial. When the book is published, no doubt it also can be cited. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:14, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Probably notable . The refs seem sufficient. DGG ( talk ) 17:50, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.