Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Kaiman (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 21:11, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jon Kaiman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Hyper-local politician fails WP:NPOL. If there is no consensus to delete, redirect to 2022 United States House of Representatives elections in New York. KidAd • SPEAK 17:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Redirect >>> 2022 United States House of Representatives elections in New York#District 3.Djflem (talk) 18:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete a non-notable local politician. This is far too soon in the election cycle to even consider a redirect.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Town supervisor is not an inherently notable role that guarantees inclusion in Wikipedia in and of itself, being a candidate in a future election that he hasn't already won yet doesn't help (the notability test for politicians is holding a notable office, not just running for one), and the sourcing is nowhere near adequate to make him appreciably more notable than the norm for either of those roles. Bearcat (talk) 20:38, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Candidates do not warrant their own articles unless they meet another form of notability criteria, which is not the case here Such-change47 (talk) 12:36, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.