Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Brædder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:52, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

John Brædder

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPOL. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as page creator. This user has been nominating many of my page creations for deletion, and while some are fine and make sense, others do not. I have been inactive on Wikipedia for a while, for similar hounding reasons, but I keep getting mails so I'm gonna pop in and say something here. I understand that mayors of Danish municipalities might not be seen as notable for someone living on the other side of the world, but that doesn't (or shouldn't, at least) matter on Wikipedia. Any modern Danish mayor will very easily meet GNG by getting a lot of coverage in the news (in independent reliable sources such as Dr.dk, Tv2.dk, Danskekommuner.dk, Altinget.dk, etc.). NPOL is for the same reasons also met. It says: "Major local political figures who have received significant press coverage." - that would be pretty much any modern Danish mayor. Especially so John Brædder, one of the few mayors from a local political party. I have expanded the page to include more sources. Kaffe42 (talk) 19:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment mayor of Guldborgsund Municipality from 2010 to 2022. --Enos733 (talk) 20:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete mayors get local and otherwise trivial coverage. So no big surprise this one would. That doesn't mean he, or any other mayor with similar coverage, passes WP:NPOL or any other notability guideline. --Adamant1 (talk) 23:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there is not the level of significant coverage we need to justify having an article on a mayor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This man is simply a mayor, which is not inherently notable. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:50, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.