Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Reiter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. (non-admin closure) — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 20:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Reiter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unlikely to pass GNG and anybio. Not enough substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources; Once upon a daylight dreary (talk) 16:28, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Ohio. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - meets criteria #5 of WP:NACADEMIC as holding a named chair position, the Albert Bowers Endowed Chair. Additionally has an h-index of 59, his work has been cited over 16,000 times by others; and he has won quite a few notable awards. Note to nominator: WP:ANYBIO states that Many scientists, researchers, philosophers and other scholars (collectively referred to as "academics" for convenience) are notably influential in the world of ideas without their biographies being the subject of secondary sources. Netherzone (talk) 17:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC) Modifying my iVote, I agree that Speedy is in order. Netherzone (talk) 00:20, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. Citation record looks like a plausible pass of WP:NPROF C1, even in a higher citation field, and I think that the endowed chair passes WP:NPROF C5. Speedy since the nominator did not consider the correct notability criterion. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep per Russ Woodroofe; the correct notability guideline was not consulted, and when consulted, it is passed. XOR'easter (talk) 20:07, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep as above. The nominator might like to withdraw this mistaken nomination. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:18, 16 September 2024 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.