Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeopardy! recurring categories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 13:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jeopardy! recurring categories

Article contains information that is not particularly notable and appears to be a list of some (not all) categories that appear at no specific interval on the program. Sottolacqua (talk) 21:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take Articles that should be deleted for $600, Alex.
It's one of the three reasons why Jeopardy! recurring categories should be deleted.
What is original research?
Correct. Lack of reliable third-party sources and poorly-defined list are the others. Go again.

Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 21:28, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment what is not an appropriate topic for a wikipedia article? In other words, delete. StarM 00:32, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article is a list of trivia and sourced entirely using one website. If it's not there yet, we can link the site in the main Jeopardy! article, but this wouldn't be maintainable if kept. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:46, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as trivia. And hey, I resisted the urge to phrase my answer in the form of a question! -- Whpq (talk) 17:33, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Sarilox (talk) 05:07, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.