Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jason Shaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:23, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jason Shaw

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed by TonyTheTiger, saying this should be expanded with details about his relationship with Paris Hilton, but the facts actually are that he only apparently dated Paris Hilton a few years and there's nothing else to suggest he was otherwise best known for anything else even including his relationship (to be honest, there's not even much solid in-depth coverage about the relationship as it is). As mentioned with my PROD here, my searches found exactly the expected coverage, gossip and passing mentions and the longest work he ever had was only four episodes of one TV show, it also seems he's no longer active with the entertainment area as well. It's also worth this is a particularly troubled BLP article (basically unsourced) with a few vandalisms here and there. SwisterTwister talk 06:18, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:19, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was not saying the article should or should not be kept. I just felt the deletion decision deserved fuller attention because of the possibility that there may be a way to meet the WP:GNG threshold. I am sure a proper decision will be reached here with full consideration.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:09, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article has only IMDB as a source, which is pretty weak. On Google I found many doctors and lawyers but the IMDB result was pretty low down I believe. Cocoaguy ここがいい 06:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED. IMDb is not an acceptable source (especially as an only source) for a BLP. Although being "the spokesmodel" for Tommy Hilfiger should lend itself to notability, I can find no reliable source saying that claim is actually true, which leads me to believe that it is not. He certainly modelled for Hilfiger and for some other brands, but nothing that has been covered in any kind of depth in reliable sources. There's a couple of write-ups about a home he's selling (or has sold) in LA, but that's not particularly noteworthy, and as expected there are a few passing mentions of him in articles about Paris Hilton. Fails WP:GNG overall. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 17:04, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom and above editors. Not enough in-depth coverage on search engines to show he meets notability criteria. As Ivanvector correctly pointed out, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:37, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.