Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaidy Gutiérrez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 17:38, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jaidy Gutiérrez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested Prod, however deletion rationale remains valid, namely: the player fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG.

A couple of sources have been added to the article, but these are insufficient to satisfy GNG:

espndeportes.espn.com - a very brief article reporting how she was called up to play for her club when the main goalkeeper was on international duty. Essentially a two sentence quote from her manager. Trivial rather than significant coverage.

marca.com - a slightly longer article, but essentially dealing with the same event as the first source. There's not a great amount that could be used for encyclopedic content and the two sources definitely can't be used in tandem to support GNG when they deal with the same event. Fenix down (talk) 10:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Fenix down (talk) 10:53, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:02, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:15, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:15, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:16, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:16, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman
Delete I do not see any evidence that the player passes WP:NFOOTBALL. Pinging Hmlarson Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 12:09, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not even close to meeting notability guidelines. I have to admit I am always skeptical on articles where the info box has more text than the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:06, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:GNG. Coverage in ESPN and MARCA is notable - particularly for a women's footballer in Mexico. Article could use expansion and improved referencing per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 18:58, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 02:19, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Given that they both concern the same event, this would simply be a case of WP:BLP1E. Furthermore the fact that there is a degree of coverage in a given outlet is irrelevant to GNG, it is the significance of that coverage that matters, which here is trivial. Fenix down (talk) 08:34, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFOOTY failure. Number 5 7 10:23, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.